A group of families who went through a very similiar crisis when adopting from Vietnam in 2007 wrote this letter on our behalf.
To: The Honorable Hillary Rodham Clinton, Secretary of State
Date: October 20, 2010
Re: Concern for US Families Held in Adoption Situation in Nepal
Cc: Janet Napolitano, Secretary of Homeland Security; Scott H. DeLisi, US
Ambassador to Nepal; US Consulate in Nepal; Corinna Luna-Benavides, USCIS
Field Office Director in New Delhi
Cc: Sen John Kerry, Sen Barbara Boxer, Sen Richard Burr, Sen Kay Hagan, Sen
Grassly, Sen Harkin, Sen Alexander, Sen Corker, Sen LeMieux, Sen Nelson,
Sen Feinstein, Sen Gillibrand, Sen Schumer, Senator Menendez, Senator
Lautenberg, Congressman Lobiando, Congressman Price
Cc: any of the families concerned in Nepal
Dear Secretary Clinton,
As adoptive parents whose children were issued NOIDs in Vietnam, we understand
perhaps better than anyone else what the parents caught in Nepal are experiencing. We
are writing this open letter today in the hopes that it will help our elected officials better
understand some of what the families in Nepal are experiencing and impel them to assist
these families. It is our sincere hope that in the long term, more situations like these can
be avoided.
In Fall 2007, we were among the twenty families fearfully awaiting results of investigations
into our cases, frantically seeking information but hearing little but silence from DOS and
CIS, and desperately hoping for assistance and support from our public officials. It
saddens us beyond belief that the State Department has failed to learn the lessons of the
past, and continues to sign MOUs with countries with insufficient will or ability to provide
a transparent process. The result is that the MOUs fail to protect US citizens adopting from
these countries. There will always be new families hoping to adopt, and in order to protect
them, it is incumbent on the State Department to retain an institutional memory of what
happened in Cambodia, Vietnam, Guatemala, Vietnam again, and now Nepal.
In each of our cases, we were issued a NOID. In each of our cases, the NOID was
cleared. While three families were able to return home at that point, each of the other
families were forced to wait out the results of a Request for Revocation request. We
adopted our children in September and October; most of us were not able to bring our
children home until February. One family remained caught in this nightmare until August
of 2008. We lived as families in pieces, far from our children or from our children and other
loved ones. We were forced to hire in-country investigators and US attorneys; many of us
had to maintain two households or pay for foster care for our adopted children, while at the
same time taking extended and unpaid leave from our jobs. Communication from DOS
and CIS was appallingly, unforgivably lacking. Unless you have ever had to leave your
child behind in an unfamiliar country, not knowing when or if you would see them again,
you cannot imagine what we went through.
So we are here today to ask you to do more than simply see that these cases are
expedited, though that is certainly something we desire on behalf of these families. We
would also ask you to take a long, hard look at the purpose and the entire process for
handling the "pipeline cases" after an adoption process is suspended in a country, and for
issuing RFEs and NOIDs, and ask that you recognize that when it comes to international
adoption, NOIDs and RFEs cannot prove corruption, and cannot punish the guilty. As it
was explained to us by DOS officials in Vietnam, in the NOID (and by extension the RFE)
process, the burden is on the adoptive parents, not DOS, to answer any questions raised
about how a child came into care at an orphanage. It is not DOS’s responsibility to reunite
children with their birth families if the child’s visa is denied. In fact, we were told that it was
not the job of DOS officials to take into account the fate of individual children who were
permanently denied immigration visas to the US.
Under the circumstances, our families would like to affirm that:
1. The adoptive parents in Nepal have done nothing wrong
2. The children are clearly innocent of any crime
3. The paperwork in question was provided to these parents by their agencies, and yet the
parents are held solely legally responsible, and face the consequences on their own.
4. No one is looking out for these children other than their adoptive parents.
It is tragically clear that history is repeating itself. But given your own lifelong professional
and personal commitment to issues that concern children and families, and your current
position as Secretary of State, you are in a unique position to both understand and help
these families. Our own hearts go out to the families and the children they have already
adopted. We know that they are trying to do nothing more than protect these children, and
we wish them a swift resolution that is truly in the best interests of their children.
Yours,
Mary and Martin Quigley, NC, parents of Maggie (bio) and Mickey (Vietnam)
Julie and Steve Carroll, CA, parents of Jeremy and Grayson (bio), and Madelyn-Grace and
Lillian Rose (Vietnam)
Jewel and Claude McRoberts, TN and FL, parents of Noah and Malachi (bio), and Jordan
and Eden (Vietnam)
Wendy and Thomas Mills, CA, parents of Julie (Vietnam)
Tracy Sumner and Jim Cameron, NC, parent of Ian (Vietnam)
Chanin and David French, NY, parents of Oliver (Vietnam) and Hazel (bio)
Karla Brendler and Mandi Kowal, IA, parents of Madison (Vietnam)
Monica and George DiGioacchino, CA, parents of Patrick (Vietnam)
Tommi-Lynn Sawyer, NJ, mother to Anabelle (Vietnam